Poster prizes at ‘Defining and defeating metastasis’ – meet the winners!

We are excited to present the poster prizes awarded at the recent EMBO | EMBL Symposium  ‘Defining and defeating metastasis’,  hosted at the Advanced Training Centre in Heidelberg and bringing together researchers from diverse fields to enhance our understanding of the dissemination and metastatic colonisation of tumour cells. It provided a unique opportunity for interdisciplinary exchange on current approaches and future collaborations on metastasis and its therapeutic challenges. As with most events this year, for many participants this was the first onsite meeting that they attended since early 2020 which made it very special. It was a fantastic opportunity to meet in person for the three days full of exciting science, exchanging ideas, presenting latest research, catching up with old friends and making new ones. There were two live poster sessions during which the presenters could discuss their research– their work was then voted for by other attendees and speakers. We are pleased to be able to share with you the research from four out of six winners of the conference prizes: congratulations to all!

Jagged-1 promotes breast cancer metastasis through the lymphatic system

Presenter: Benjamin Gordon

Benjamin Gordon – University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine, USA
Abstract

While early detection of breast cancer (BC) has improved prognoses, there is an urgent need to improve outcomes for patients with distant metastatic disease. Higher expression of the Notch ligand JAG1 in primary BC tumors is strongly associated with lymph node metastasis and patient mortality, but causality is unclear. We show that JAG1 expression is higher in metastatic BC cells colonizing lymph nodes than in primary tumors, suggesting that tumor cells with high JAG1 are preferentially able to metastasize to lymph nodes. JAG1 expression is higher in a derivative of BC line MDA MB 231 selected for tropism to lymph nodes (MDA231 LN) than in the parental line or derivatives with other tropisms. To determine the mechanism(s) of JAG1 mediated metastasis, we generated clonal JAG1 knockout cell lines from MDA231 LN cells with corresponding JAG1 rescue lines. We investigated the role of JAG1 in spontaneous metastasis under clinically relevant conditions by orthotopically implanting JAG1 knockout and expressing cells, resecting the primary tumor, and following long term metastatic spread in a mouse model. Quantification of tumor cells in blood showed that survival, metastatic burden, and JAG1 expression did not correlate with the number of circulating tumor cells. Conversely, JAG1 expression drove an increase in lymph node and body wide metastatic burden and a trend toward decreased survival. In this model, metastatic cells were abundant throughout lymph vessels, suggesting lymphatics are the primarily route of dissemination. Preliminary transcriptional analysis suggests that JAG1 alters interactions with lymphatic endothelial cells (LEC), leading us to examine downstream events in co cultures of LEC with lymphatically invasive BC lines. Deciphering tumor lymphatic endothelial signaling events may open new avenues to target BC metastasis.

View the poster

Poster Prize from the EMBO Journal

Biphasic contribution of platelets to metastasis

Presenter: María J. García-León

Maria J. Garcia-Leon – INSERM UMR_S1109, Tumor Biomechanics, Université de Strasbourg, France
Abstract

Metastasis still remains elusive to treatment, with an overwhelming mortality rate of 90%. Accumulating evidence indicates that metastatic potential of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) can be tuned by intravascular components, including platelets. Platelet depletion impairs metastasis, which can be rescued upon platelet transfusion. Mechanistically, CTCs rapidly bind, activate and aggregate platelets, events that are crucial for the arrest, survival, and extravasation of the former. The current dogma states that platelets tune metastasis by impacting CTCs behaviour at early stages of metastatic seeding. However, whether platelets can regulate metastasis at later stage and which receptors may be involved remains unknown. In this study, we first documented the efficiency of platelet binding to a large panel of metastatic TCs and observed that not all recruit or aggregate platelets with the same efficiency. Interestingly, such binding impacts their intravascular fate by favoring their arrest, as observed in a combination of experimental metastasis models in thrombocytopenic (TCP) mice and zebrafish embryo. Using longitudinal imaging of metastatic seeding and growth in TCP mice at unprecedented spatial and temporal resolution, we demonstrated that binding and aggregation correlates with their metastatic potential in vivo. Additionally, by the dynamic in vivo tracking of TCs in the lungs of fully TCP mice, and the quantification of platelets depositions around arrested CTCs at seeding and late metastatic outgrowth, we showed that early platelet binding, aggregation, clot formation, and the subsequent increased adhesion and survival at lung microvessels, are capital but not exclusive factors increasing TC metastatic fitness. We observed that platelets contribute to late steps of metastatic outgrowth by experimentally interfering with platelet counts in animals already carrying metastatic foci. Doing so, we observed that platelets tune the growth of established foci, independently of their early intravascular interaction with CTCs. Finally, we have identified the platelet collagen receptor GPVI as key in this late modulation of metastatic outgrowth, suggesting its targeting in specific cancer types as a promising adjuvant therapy in oncologic patients to stop the metastatic progression.

View the poster

Poster Prize from EMBO Molecular Medicine

Colonic fibroblasts in tissue homeostasis and cancer

Presenter: Michael Brügger

Michael Brügger – University of Zürich, Switzerland
Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the most prevalent cancers in Switzerland (2nd in women 3rd in men, BFS statistics 2013 2017) and worldwide (3rd in women and men). More than half of the patients diagnosed with CRC either harbour metastases or will develop metastatic disease, which is the primary cause of death for CRC patients. There is therefore a dire need for new therapies. These must be guided by a better understanding of the metastatic process. We are only now starting to appreciate the contribution of not only tumour cells themselves, but also the non tumour stromal cells of the tumour microenvironment (TME) to tumour growth, progression and metastasis. To understand how non tumour stromal cells are changed in CRC it is integral to first characterize their identity and functions during colonic homeostasis.
To describe the stromal cell populations in an unbiased manner, we carried out a single cell transcriptome analysis of the adult murine colon, producing a high quality atlas of matched colonic epithelium and mesenchyme. We identify two crypt associated colonic fibroblast populations that are demarcated by different strengths of platelet derived growth factor receptor A (Pdgfra) expression. Crypt bottom fibroblasts (CBFs), close to the intestinal stem cells, express low levels of Pdgfra and secrete canonical Wnt ligands, Wnt potentiators, and bone morphogenetic protein (Bmp) inhibitors. Crypt top fibroblasts (CTFs) exhibit high Pdgfra levels and secrete noncanonical Wnts and Bmp ligands. While the Pdgfralow cells maintain intestinal stem cell proliferation, the Pdgfrahigh cells induce differentiation of the epithelial cells. Notably, these cell populations are conserved in the human colon.
Recently, we established a murine model of metastatic colorectal cancer, based on the orthotopic endoscopy guided injection of cancer organoids (colonic organoids harbouring mutations in APC, Kras, Tp53 and Smad4). In this context we study how the abovementioned fibroblast populations are affected by the primary tumour and how they in turn affect tumour progression.

View the poster

Single cell transcriptomic profiling of brain metastatic founders in small cell lung cancer patient derived models to identify potential vulnerabilities

Presenter: Maria Peiris-Pagès

Maria Peiris Pages – Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, UK
Abstract

Background: Brain metastasis is a major cause of patient morbidity and mortality in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) with an ~80% incidence during disease progression, contributing to the dismal 5 year survival rate of <7%. Mechanisms underpinning SCLC brain metastasis are understudied due to scarcity of brain biopsies and preclinical models. We have developed a biobank of >60 circulating tumour cell (CTC) derived patient explant models of SCLC in immunodeficient mice (CDX) where brain metastasis is routinely observed upon resection of the subcutaneous (S.C) tumour
Methods: We developed an in vivo S.C tumour resection workflow in brain tropic CDX3P to isolate single CTCs, early brain founder tumour cells and subsequent established brain metastases. Following FACS of CDX cells from dissociated mouse brain (using a human CD147 antibody) we performed single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) to reveal potential molecular regulators hypothesised to support brain metastatic founding and subsequent colonisation
Results: Brain metastases were detectable in CDX3P on average 195 days after S.C implantation (study length 174 230 days). We analysed 58 single CTCs (n=6 mice, 191 230 days) and 214 brain metastatic founder cells (n=2 mice, 205 218 days) by scRNAseq. Bioinformatics analyses defined transcriptomic features underpinning single cell heterogeneity and identified sub populations within CTCs and metastatic founders indicative of brain tropic CTC sub clones. We also characterised molecular features unique to brain founders as candidates that could serve as therapy targets
Future Tissue expression of candidate genes of brain metastatic founding will be validated in CDX and patient samples. Genetic manipulation of CDX cells ex vivo combined with pharmacological approaches will be used to explore their roles in metastatic seeding and to identify potential vulnerabilities. Transcriptomic analysis of cells from established brain metastases obtained from the above in vivo protocol will be conducted to explore molecular programs of brain colonisation. Combined, these data will contribute to our long term goal of identifying novel therapeutic strategies that may ultimately improve the quality of life for the significant number of patients with SCLC who present with or subsequently develop brain lesions.

Due to the confidentiality of the unpublished data, we cannot share the poster.

Effective treatment of colorectal peritoneal metastases by exploiting a molecular subtype specific vulnerability

Presenter: Sanne Bootsma

Sanne Bootsma, Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands
Abstract

In colorectal cancer, peritoneal metastases (PMs) associate with severe morbidity and dismal prognosis. Given the incidence of this disease and the lack of adequate treatments currently available, PMs pose a large unmet clinical need. Although PMs can be accompanied by more widespread metastatic disease, it often occurs as the only sign of dissemination. This implies that the route of metastatic spread to the peritoneum differs from that to distant organs. PMs are thought to result from cancer cells that spill into the abdominal cavity, and are able to attach to the peritoneal lining and form tumor deposits. This cascade places specific demands on the cancer cells.
Here, we report that colorectal cancers that present with PMs almost universally classify as consensus molecular subtype 4 (CMS4). This previously recognized disease entity is characterized by mesenchymal features, poor prognosis, and resistance to therapies currently used against peritoneal metastases, which explains their limited efficacy. By leveraging disease models that capture CMS4 specific features, including the ability to form PMs in vivo, we identified elesclomol as a highly effective agent. Elesclomol kills cancer cells in a copper dependent fashion by targeting the oxidative phosphorylation machinery, which we found to be a specific vulnerability of CMS4 cancers. Elesclomol Cu2+ was effective following only minutes of exposure to CMS4 cell lines and organoids, supporting its use in intra abdominal treatment procedures. It is therefore a promising candidate for the local treatment of peritoneal metastases of colorectal cancer.

View the poster

Poster Prize from Metastasis Research Society

 

The remaining prize was:

Short talk Prize from Metastasis Research Society: Eric Rahrmann – University of Cambridge, UK

 

Congratulations to all six winners!

The EMBO | EMBL Symposium ‘Defining and defeating metastasis’ took place from 19 – 22 June 2022 at EMBL Heidelberg and was streamed online for virtual participants.

Follow us:

Meet the EMBL Events Team: Michelle

Meet Michelle, the Digital Strategy Officer in the EMBL-EBI Training team. She works with our European Commission funded projects such as BioExcel and CINECA. She is responsible for the social media and content for these projects along with organising scientific courses and conferences. Michelle has just returned back to the UK after spending 6 months with her family in Qatar due to the pandemic.

Michelle Mendonca, Digital Strategy Officer at EMBL-EBI

EMBL-EBI start date: August 2018
Number of organised events at EMBL-EBI: 12

What is your favourite place in Hinxton area?
The little nature walks spread across campus are my favourite. It is always refreshing to be able to take a break from work and be surrounded by greenery and beautiful flowers.

What is the first thing you do before a course starts and the first thing you do after a course finishes? 
The first thing I do before I start a course is making sure I am well organised and I have everything I need to get started. The first thing I do after a course is finished, is to congratulate everyone on the team and have a long nap.

What are the challenges/differences of organising a virtual course? 
I think one of the big differences for me is not to physically see if the delegates are finding everything alright. However, I do think virtual courses have opened up a whole new avenue for inclusivity and accessibility which means we get to reach a lot more people and that is always great.

You’ve been working from home for 13 months now; how have you adapted your role during this time? 
Adapting to the new role was challenging at first and it took a while to find a new routine and way of working. I am working on developing better ways of communication to maintain my interactions with colleagues.

PHOTO: Michelle in Qatar

If you weren’t a Digital Strategy Officer what would you be? 
I would be doing something in the creative or entrepreneurship field. So probably a YouTuber or a cafe owner in an alternate universe.

If you were a superhero what power would you like to have? 
I love the Marvel series and recently watched WandaVision. So my superpower would be moving objects with the mind like Scarlet Witch from the show.

What is your favourite movie? 
I don’t have a favourite movie but I am a big Bollywood fan, especially all the movies from the 90s and early 2000s.

Upcoming events that Michelle is organising:
EMBO Workshop: Advances and Challenges in Biomolecular Simulations , 18 – 21 October 2021, virtual.

Follow us:

Friend or Foe: Transcription and RNA Meet DNA Replication and Repair

Event Report by Apoorva Baluapuri, University of Würzburg, Germany

RNA and DNA were first described by the Swiss biologist Friedrich Miescher in 1868. About 150 years later, we stand at crossroads of the two disciplines which have arisen as a result of dedicated research on both molecules. The first EMBL symposium on the connections between transcription and DNA replication/repair research was a major step forward in combining the progress from wide ranging topics, thus generating a consensus on how gene expression and DNA transactions cooperate.

The symposium, which was the second one from EMBL this year,  was scheduled just a day after International Women’s Day, and that aligned very well with the equally represented line-up of speakers and organisers!

The titular opening session was dedicated to transcription-associated genomic instability where all aspects of R-loops and ribonucleotide excision repair in transcription coupled DNA double strand break repair were covered. For example, Gaëlle Legube (CNRS – University of Toulouse, France) expanded in great detail on the influence of DSB-induced chromatin conformation and the strong potential of 3C-based technologies, while Elodie Hatchi (Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA) explained about her recent publication in Nature concerning the impact of BRCA1, RAD52 and PALB2 on small RNA-driven DNA repair.

Eventually, we switched over to a more translational theme with Rushad Pavri (IMP, Vienna, Austria) who spoke about the relation between DNA replication timing and frequency of oncogenic translocations.

This time around, the poster presentation sessions were equally dynamic with topics being covered from role of RBMX in RNA processing (Sara Luzzi, University of Newcastle) to role of MYCN in reconciling elevated transcription levels with DNA replication (Dimitrios Papadopoulos, University of Würzburg, Germany).

To end the first day, Philippe Pasero (CNRS, France) tried to answer the old question of the chicken or the egg in terms of toxic R-loops, if they are the cause or consequences of DNA replication stress, while Andrew Deans (St. Vincent’s Institute of Medical Research, Australia) explained about fork re-modellers as a general mechanism of R-loop removal.

The second day started out on a high note by a talk on the consequences of DNA damage and heat shock on Pol II from Jesper Svejstrup. Prof Svejstrup recently moved his lab from the Francis Crick Institute in London to the University of Copenhagen (Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences).

To make things even more exciting at the symposium, Martin Eilers (University of Würzburg, Germany) spoke about conflict resolution by MYCN between “friends and foes”, i.e. Pol II and replication fork. This was followed by talk by Marco Foiani (University of Milan, Italy) who showed the role of ATR in nuclear integrity.

In between the breaks, the participants eagerly shared their setup of how they were joining the virtual conference:

Not only were the home setups on display, but we also got a glimpse of “add-on” participants at the conference:

https://twitter.com/luzzi_s/status/1369373077394644997

Along with this fun, the second day’s poster session continued with equally interesting topics as the previous day. The virtual conference platform provided by Engagez came across as a handy tool in coming as close as possible to the in-person poster presentations.

Frédéric Chédin (University of California, Davis, USA) closed the day by talking about interplay between splicing and R-loops.

In the next two days, a wide variety of topics and methods were covered. For example,  Nick Proudfoot (University of Oxford, UK) dazzled with correlation between R-loops and antisense transcription while Petra Beli (IMB, Mainz, Germany) moved the focus from genomics to proteomics with èlan. She spoke about a method called “RDProx” which maps R-loop proximal proteome in a native chromatin environment.

Also, junior group leaders like Marco Saponaro (University of Birmingham, UK) answered what happens to replication when it encounters transcription and Madzia Crossley (Stanford University, USA) showed CytoDRIP-blots to probe RNA-DNA hybrids on gels which showed that SETX and BRCA1 loss, along with splicing inhibition, results accumulation of RNA-DNA hybrids in cytoplasm!

All along the talks, whichever questions (which, by the way, were in majority from younger researchers) didn’t get answered, were posted and responded to in the “Forum” section: this actually became a valuable summary of quite a few topics.

The networking options were also in abundance, be it the Virtual Bar mixer, or Meet the Editors session on the online platform. Given that editors from elite journals like EMBO, PLoS Biology etc. were present, it gave a nice opportunity for the researchers to gauge where their next big story could find a good home.

In summary, the symposium gave the feeling of being cozy without being too small and specific in terms of the topics covered, and benefited both the experienced and young researchers in an equal way. It was a common understanding and expectation among the participants that this symposium would perhaps be held in person next time if possible.

Follow us:

Looking back on a year of organising virtual events

Exactly one year ago, the Covid-19 pandemic hit Europe. All on-site events had to be cancelled and we had to rethink our entire program. Our Course and Conference Officers worked really hard to create a virtual equivalent of EMBL’s on-site training offering.  We successfully launched our first virtual conference and many more followed. 

The learning curve was steep and so was the stress level. But when the going gets tough, the tough get going. Two of our Conference Officers, Nathalie and Diah, share with us their experience from being in the eye of the storm, the lessons they have learned and some tips for organising a virtual meeting.

Conference Officers Nathalie and Diah
Conference Officers Nathalie (left) and Diah

How does organising a virtual event compare to organising an on-site event?

Diah: “It is a different world, but equally fun! Organising a virtual event is harder than people think and often more challenging. Not getting to see anyone in person and mastering all sorts of virtual platforms can be quite tough.”

Nathalie: “Some of the milestones we have are the same, for example: preparing the website, programme, opening registration, emails with participants and invited speakers, abstract review and selection… But a huge bulk of the work is totally different: instead of booking buses and ordering catering, we are setting up Zoom webinars and populating the virtual platform.

The massive change has been adapting to the new tasks we have to do and how we should do them consistently for all our events. In our team we have numerous working groups looking at areas of event organisation and creating guidelines, procedures and templates that will help us all. It really is a whole team effort!”

Read: Why do we charge fees for virtual events?

What kind of feedback do you get from participants, speakers and organisers?

Nathalie: “The feedback I have received from speakers and participants has been great: they are so happy we converted our event to virtual instead of cancelling/postponing it. Initially a few speakers were disappointed for the event to turn virtual but the same people commented afterwards that they were impressed with how well it went. What is wonderful is that it is still so beneficial for them in their continued research.”

Diah: “Very humbling! Many agree that onsite face-to-face events are somehow irreplaceable but at the same time they are amazed at the number of benefits virtual events offer too! They give you more flexibility: you don’t have to travel across the world. Also, some people feel more comfortable asking questions in the virtual format. ”

What is the most important lesson you have learned about organising virtual events?

Nathalie: “It’s been necessary for us to turn to virtual events but the lessons we have learned are that virtual events are effective, valuable and have many advantages! We’ve noticed that participants feel more comfortable asking questions during Q&A, that virtual talks have had a wonderful response, that virtual networking works well and you can meet different people from all over the world just at your desk!

On a bigger scale, virtual events mean less travel and a lower carbon footprint and they are more inclusive as they allow some people to participate who couldn’t have done so before. This is hugely important and is a very positive outcome of this difficult situation and it will have an impact on how events are organised in the future.”

What do you miss most about on-site events?

Diah: “The buzz when everyone arrives and the ATC is full of people is very exciting – after all the planning, everyone is there! And my favourite moment is the end of the conference: everyone is smiling and happy and you wave goodbye to the buses that leave EMBL. That sense of relief and accomplishment at the same time. I miss that!”

Nathalie: “Parties! One of the best things about the onsite events is meeting the speakers and participants you’ve been in touch with for months and when it comes to the conference party, it is really fun to see everyone let their hair down and enjoy themselves! And taking silly pictures at the Photobooth with people is something I loved and a really cute memento of the conference. That is a small thing I miss too!”

What in your opinion makes virtual events better than on-site events?

Nathalie: “The inclusiveness: more participants can take part as there is not the same financial barrier (travel, accommodation) and people can join from anywhere in the world.”

Diah: “Virtual events are resilient. There is no need to cancel an event because of the weather or a disaster. Participants can attend the event from anywhere!”

Conference Officer Diah wearing a face mask in an empty auditorium during a virtual event
Conference Officer Diah working a shift in an empty Auditorium

A common criticism is that networking doesn’t work well in the virtual world. What is your experience with virtual social events?

Nathalie: “I think it is great to see how Zoom breakout rooms allow people to mix in small groups or 1-to-1. Particularly the speed networking translates very well.”

Diah: “It’s my favorite part of the programme and I am amazed at how well it has been accepted and running so far. We have had live-streamed concerts and participants love it. At one conference some of the scientific organisers even stayed for the whole duration of the social session and wanted to continue mingling even after it had finished.”

Read our blog on virtual speednetworking.

Top tips to keep in mind while organising a virtual event?

Nathalie: “First of all – be open-minded. There are so many new technologies out there and different things you can try!

Have clear guidelines and templates: you use so many different apps and systems that saving time when setting things up can be a lifesaver!”

Diah: “I would also say: Test, test and test. Glitches are always likely to happen, so be prepared and stay calm.”

Read our blog for more tips on how to organise a virtual event

How do you see the future of EMBL Events?

Nathalie: “I hope we will embrace this new world of virtual events and have effective hybrid events in the future: allowing for face-to-face interaction for those who want to come on-site, but also giving the opportunity for those who prefer to join virtually and get the benefit of being part of the event without having to leave their home!”

Diah: “I think hybrid events will take a central place in the format of EMBL Events in the future. But whatever the format will be, we will keep improving and finding the best way to support the scientific community.”

Looking back in general, what are your thoughts?

Diah and Nathalie: “It has been very rewarding during the last year to see how we at EMBL have been able to adapt to the situation we have found ourselves in and been able to ensure that we can still provide a platform for scientific exchange. The aim of EICAT is to provide excellent training to scientists, and, despite the challenges, this is being achieved virtually for the first time! We are really proud of being able to provide opportunities for this exchange of knowledge and research.

Personally, this time has also been one of continuous learning for all of us on the team. We have developed our skills and experience in a number of ways and massively increased our knowledge of online platforms and tools! It has truly been a time of teamwork as we have adapted into the virtual event world and we are grateful to everyone involved: our marketing team, our Photolab technicians, designers and scientific organisers. It has been a challenging but very valuable learning experience!”

Follow us:

Meet the EMBL Events Team: Jane

PHOTO: Jane Reynolds

Today’s interview is with EMBL-EBI’s Jane Reynolds. Jane is one of the event organisers in the team, and joined in December 2020. Jane’s focus is on the on-site and virtual training courses.

At EMBL since: December 2020
Number of organised courses: 1

 Favourite place in Hinxton area? Having joined EMBL-EBI just before Christmas, I haven’t been able to explore Hinxton yet. I did enjoy a virtual tour of the conference centre though, which gave me an insight of where the course dinners take place.

What is the first thing you do before a course starts and the first thing you do after a course finishes? Before an event starts, I remind myself of the hard work and preparation that’s already been done and that the best thing I can do from here on in is be present and ready to deal with anything that might arise. After an event finished? Well, it sounds a bit dull but I usually make a quick list of things that could be improved (as well as those that went really well). Particularly working in new formats, it’s often only by running an event that you notice the small changes that can be made to improve the experiences of delegates or speakers. I like to capture these while they are fresh in my mind.

What are the challenges/differences of organising a virtual course? One of the major changes has been how big chunks of work have shifted closer to the start date of an event; for example, delegates tend to sign up later to online events than in-person events, even if they are advertised for the same length of time as usual, so the timeframe for dealing with the administration related to this is shorter.  The work definitely has a different rhythm to it and the tools and systems have changed but the reason we’re doing it is the same.  Remembering this has helped me to adapt.  Although I have to say I am really looking forward to meeting delegates (and my new colleagues!) in person when the time comes.

You’ve been working from home since you started your role at EMBL-EBI; how has this been for you? As well as working from home, I’ve been lucky enough to start a new role in the past year, and it’s been an interesting (hopefully once-in-a-lifetime!) experience.  Luckily the Training Team at EMBL-EBI have been wonderful in sharing their knowledge with me and given me a very warm virtual welcome.

If you weren’t a EMBL-EBI events organisers what would you be? Probably a teacher of some kind.  Before I started working in events and engagement, I worked as an English Language Assistant, which I really enjoyed, so ideally I’d combine teaching and travel.

PHOTO: weekend city break in Copenhagen May 2020

What is the strangest/funniest thing that has ever happened in a course? My birthday is in July and in my past jobs this has been the busiest time – either at Graduation events or summer events – so I have often spent it working, but never in an office!  I’ve been organising table plans in Liverpool Cathedral, at a Massive Attack concert in a disused train depot or hosting tours of new exhibitions…one of my favourite things about working in events is that there is rarely a dull moment!

If you were a superhero what power would you like to have?  I love learning languages but it’s hard to find the time…so definitely the ability to speak and understand different languages without having to learn verb tables!

What is your favourite TV show? Like everyone I’ve watched a lot more TV than usual over the past year, but The Sopranos – which has stood up to a rewatch or two – remains my favourite.

Upcoming events that Jane is organising: Cancer genomics 2021 – virtual 

Follow us: